Ce matin, j'en lis une bonne :le gouvernement s'attaque aux assurances vie. Fondamentalement, je me dis, pourquoi pas. C'est une source de dividendes, dans le contexte de réduction de la dette publique, ça peut avoir du sens selon les conditions.
Or, si on écoute les gens "qui connaissent leur sujet", que ça veut dire imposer (à hauteur de 3,5%) les cotisations des complémentaires santé, les mutuelles donc. Est en effet visé le contrat "solidaire et responsable" qui représente aujourd'hui la quasi-totalité des complémentaires santé. Bercy aurait déclaré "il n'y a donc plus besoin d'une incitation fiscale très forte".
Comment ça ? Pardon ? Les cotisations de mutuelles santé sont une niche fiscale ? On tire des dividendes de nos remboursements de dépenses santé ? J'ai loupé un épisode ?
Quelqu'un peut-il venir me dire que j'ai mal lu ou bien que les analystes bien pensant ont mal compris ?
Il est où le délire ???
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est politics. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est politics. Afficher tous les articles
A law enforcement to make camera phones "click"
Date:
mardi, janvier 27, 2009
What is it ? A new anti-terrorist and/or anti-pedophile thing ? A law proposal to force cell phones with a camera to make a tone when shotting :
I think this is the kind of idea some of our representatives at the French Parliament could try to come with. Too sad to make me laught.
In wide or open area, what about long-range opticals to safely shot from far ? And for small and closed places, what about opening the cell phone box to unplug the speaker ? This is worthy for any real hunter seeking for a target (a person or a place).
This will only affect common people that would quielty and peacefully take some pictures in the middle of others that would have done it without disturbing every one or yet getting people angry just for the tone, not the pictures done.
I think this is the kind of idea some of our representatives at the French Parliament could try to come with. Too sad to make me laught.
In wide or open area, what about long-range opticals to safely shot from far ? And for small and closed places, what about opening the cell phone box to unplug the speaker ? This is worthy for any real hunter seeking for a target (a person or a place).
This will only affect common people that would quielty and peacefully take some pictures in the middle of others that would have done it without disturbing every one or yet getting people angry just for the tone, not the pictures done.
70,000 ballots canceled during a Scottish election
On the 3rd of September, the BBC revealed that during the last recent Scottish elections in May, about 70,000 ballots have been automatically canceled by the counting machines with no human oversight.
Actually, about 140,000 ballots were counted as spoilt and some of them were automatically rejected. What were the conditions to reject these 70,000s ? Is it « we take randomly an half of the spoilt ballots and we reject them » ? Or yet « we reject 50% of the spoilt ballot for each possible result » ? What is the method ? This is a public election concerning all Scottish people, so it should be definitely released and broadcasted to the citizens.
Apart of that, « the Conservative Party condemned the Scotland Office for being slow to release the information ». If the BBC investigation did not lead to this announce, would it have ever been released ?
In 2003, in Belgium, 4096 ballots that were cancelled. Wikipedia article says «The error was only detected because she had more preferential votes that her own list which is impossible in the voting system. The official explanation was The spontaneous creation of a bit at the position 13 in the memory of the computer».
What’s next ? A million of canceled/forgotten/changed ballots ?
Actually, about 140,000 ballots were counted as spoilt and some of them were automatically rejected. What were the conditions to reject these 70,000s ? Is it « we take randomly an half of the spoilt ballots and we reject them » ? Or yet « we reject 50% of the spoilt ballot for each possible result » ? What is the method ? This is a public election concerning all Scottish people, so it should be definitely released and broadcasted to the citizens.
Apart of that, « the Conservative Party condemned the Scotland Office for being slow to release the information ». If the BBC investigation did not lead to this announce, would it have ever been released ?
In 2003, in Belgium, 4096 ballots that were cancelled. Wikipedia article says «The error was only detected because she had more preferential votes that her own list which is impossible in the voting system. The official explanation was The spontaneous creation of a bit at the position 13 in the memory of the computer».
What’s next ? A million of canceled/forgotten/changed ballots ?
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)